Cancer Control and Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy as Markers of Surgical Quality: Analysis of Heterogeneity Between Surgeons at a Single Cancer Center

Background

Previous studies have shown that complications and biochemical recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy (RP) vary between different surgeons to a greater extent than might be expected by chance. Data on urinary and erectile outcomes, however, are lacking.

Objective

In this study, we examined whether between-surgeon variation, known as heterogeneity, exists for urinary and erectile outcomes after RP.

Design, setting, and participants

Our study consisted of 1910 RP patients who were treated by 1 of 11 surgeons between January 1999 and July 2007.

Intervention

All patients underwent RP at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Measurements

Patients were evaluated for functional outcome 1 yr after surgery. Multivariable random effects models were used to evaluate the heterogeneity in erectile or urinary outcome between surgeons, after adjustment for case mix (age, prostate-specific antigen, pathologic stage and grade, comorbidities) and year of surgery.

Results and limitations

We found significant heterogeneity in functional outcomes after RP (p < 0.001 for both urinary and erectile function). Four surgeons had adjusted rates of full continence <75%, whereas three had rates >85%. For erectile function, two surgeons in our series had adjusted rates <20%; another two had rates >45%. We found some evidence suggesting that surgeons’ erectile and urinary outcomes were correlated. Contrary to the hypothesis that surgeons “trade off” functional outcomes and cancer control, better rates of functional preservation were associated with lower biochemical recurrence rates.

Conclusions

A patient’s likelihood of recovering erectile and urinary function may differ depending on which of two surgeons performs his RP. Functional preservation does not appear to come at the expense of cancer control; rather, both are related to surgical quality.

References

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.045